DEPARTMENT Vr Imo NeY 1
al ae eoanrad Renee
ee ee ee ee tae oe . a
ATLINCTON, VA 22204-2490
HD
Docket No. NR6293-14
2? damarv 2015
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a} 10 U.S.C. 1552
Enel: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 18 Apr 14 w/attachments
{2) HOMC JPL memo dtd 6 Nov 14 ;
{3) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 8 Jan 15
(4) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative
Remarks (1070)") entry dated 20 September 2012 {copy at Tab #).
2. The Board,
fe sens sions of error and injustice on
22 January 2015, and pursuant & ¢ regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated ow should be taken on the
available evidence of record, Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In correspondence at enclosures {2} and (3), the
Headquarters Marine Corps offices with cognizance over the subject
matter of Petitioner's case have commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
+ Cae
* CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosures (2} and (3), the Board finds the
existence of an error and injustice warranting the following
corrective action:
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
service record page 11 (*Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated
20 September 2011. This is tobe accomplished by physically removing
the page 11 on which the entry appears, or completely obliterating
the entry so it cannot be read, rather than merely lining through
it.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
- expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.
4. Pursuant to Section 6{c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
“ “ oy x
Sor TAN Lo
JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723. 6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
the Navy.
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5935 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page ll ("Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 5 March 2013 and. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8961 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 11 March 2009 and 11 August 2011. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosures (2) and (3), the Board finds the existence of an error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5737 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No. NR5737-14 29 January 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy subj: EE osc, oo a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (ay 16 0.8
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5272 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 November 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (6), MIQ again commented to the effect that the contested entry dated 6 January 2012 should stand, but further commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove the entries dated 14 December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6355 14
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ee reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 February 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 6 April 2006.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5328 14
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 21 Mar 14 w/attachments (2) HOMC MIO memos dtd 3 Nov 14 and 6 Jan 15 (3) Subject's naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 29 March 2010 {copy at Tab A). over your max wt) .” CONCLUSION: Upon review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6848 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the illegible service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3747 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 10 May 2011 (copy at Tab A}. The Board, consisting of Ms. Trucco and Messrs. Chapman and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2014, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3392 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"} entries dated 16 February and 7 October 2012 (copies at Tabs A and B, respectively) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2015, and...